Home

2025安卓手机梯子

Calendar effects (sometimes less accurately described as ‘seasonal effects’) are cyclical anomalies in returns, where the cycle is based on the calendar. The most important calendar anomalies are the January effect and the weekend effect. The following books include sections on calendar effects: Thaler (1992), Siegel (1998), Lofthouse (2001), Constantinides, Harris and Stulz (2003), Singal (2004) and Taylor (2005). Relevant papers include Lakonishok and Smidt (1988), Hawawini and Keim (1995), Mills and Coutts (1995) and Arsad and Coutts (1997).

Sullivan, Timmermann and White (2001) highlight the dangers of data mining calendar effects and point out that using the same data set to formulate and test hypothese introduces data-mining biases that, if not accounted for, invalidate the assumptions underlying classical statistical inference. They show that the significance of calendar trading rules is much weaker when it is assessed in the context of a universe of rules that could plausibly have been evaluated. They are correct to highlight the dangers of datamining, but don't mention the fact that classical statistical inference is already flawed. A more useful reality check is to remember that a surprising result requires more evidence, Bayesian reasoning makes this clear.
P(hypothesis) = prior belief * strength of evidence
So, for example, it is quite rational to require more evidence for a lunar effect than a tax-loss selling effect.

Many calendar effects have diminished, disappeared altogether or even reversed since they were discovered.

2025安卓手机梯子

2025安卓手机梯子

速蛙云官网,速蛙云官方网址,速蛙云打不开,速蛙云2025年  2025海外ip代理  2025VP N  佛跳墙vn破解2025ios安卓下载  天极加速器7天试用,天极加速器打不开,天极加速器2025,天极加速器2025年  夜阑加速器破解版,夜阑加速器ios下载,夜阑加速器2025年,夜阑加速器打不开了  坚果加速器最新版,坚果加速器安卓下载,坚果加速器免费永久加速,坚果加速器2025  简单加速器ios下载,简单加速器用不了了,简单加速器打不开,简单加速器2025